What Happens When Memory Becomes External?

My grandmother knew recipes by heart. Dozens of them. Complex sequences of ingredients and timings that lived in her head because they had to. There was no other way to access them. When she died, some of those recipes died with her, because nobody had written them down, and memory was the only substrate on which they existed.

I don't know recipes. I look them up. Every time. This isn't laziness. It's efficiency. Why occupy neural real estate with information that can be instantly retrieved? The logic is irrefutable, which is why everyone has followed it.

But something is changing in the process, and we haven't fully reckoned with what.

The Difference Between Access and Possession

There's a distinction between knowing something and knowing where to find it. In practice, these often produce the same behavior. I can tell you the capital of Mongolia either because I memorized it or because I can look it up in under two seconds. The functional outcome is identical.

But the experience is different. When you know something, it's present to you. It shapes how you think even when you're not actively retrieving it. It connects to other things you know, forming associations and patterns. It becomes part of your cognitive identity.

When you know where to find something, it's absent until needed. It doesn't participate in your background thinking. It doesn't connect to other knowledge because you haven't accessed it yet. It exists as a pointer, not a presence.

Tell me more about the philosophy of external memory

This matters less for trivia. Nobody's thinking is impoverished by not having Mongolia's capital in active memory. But what about more substantial knowledge? What about the skills and information that constitute expertise?

The Expertise Problem

Expertise isn't just knowing things. It's having those things so deeply internalized that they shape how you perceive situations. A chess master doesn't calculate every possibility. They see the board differently than a novice does. The patterns are in their perception, not just their retrieval.

Doctors who've seen thousands of patients develop a kind of pattern recognition that can't be fully articulated. They "know" something is wrong before they can explain why. This intuitive expertise lives in memory, in the accumulated sediment of experience.

What happens when we externalize more and more of that accumulated knowledge? When the junior doctor can look up anything, but hasn't seen enough cases to develop intuition? We're running an experiment on this question right now.

The optimistic view is that externalization frees up cognitive resources for higher-order thinking. You don't need to memorize the facts if you can look them up, so you can focus on synthesis and creativity.

The pessimistic view is that certain kinds of thinking require internalized knowledge, and we're eroding the foundation while celebrating the time we've saved.

I don't know which view is right. I suspect both are partially true.

The Identity Question

Here's where it gets personal. Memory isn't just storage. It's identity. The things you remember, and especially the way you remember them, constitute who you are. Your autobiography, your sense of continuity across time, is a memory function.

We've already externalized much of this. Photos serve as memory prosthetics, helping us recall events we would otherwise forget. Social media creates a timeline of our lives that we consult like external storage. Our devices contain records of conversations, locations, activities that form a more complete and accurate account of our past than biological memory ever could.

In one sense, this is marvelous. We lose less. We can reconstruct events with precision. We have evidence against the selective editing that biological memory performs.

In another sense, it's strange. When I look at photos from ten years ago, I'm often surprised. The event I "remember" isn't quite the event the photo shows. The photo corrects my memory, overwriting it with something more accurate but somehow less mine.

Tell me more about not feeling technological change

Whose memory is it when the machine remembers better than I do? Whose autobiography when the timeline knows my past more thoroughly than my brain?

The Forgetting Problem

Biological memory forgets. This is usually framed as a limitation, but it's also a feature. Forgetting is how we get over things. How we heal. How we maintain a manageable relationship with our past.

External memory doesn't forget unless we make it forget. The embarrassing photo, the angry message, the record of that stupid thing you said at the party: all preserved indefinitely, available for retrieval at any time.

This creates a new psychological challenge. We're not built to carry the full weight of our past. We're built to selectively edit, to let painful things fade, to construct a narrative we can live with. When the external record resists that editing, we have to develop new ways of relating to our history.

Some people become obsessive about digital hygiene, constantly deleting and curating. Others adopt a posture of radical acceptance, assuming everything is recorded and learning to live with it. Neither approach quite resolves the tension between biological memory's natural forgetting and digital memory's perfect retention.

The Dependency Question

What happens when the external memory becomes unavailable?

This isn't hypothetical. Services shut down. Companies go bankrupt. Formats become obsolete. Accounts get locked. The cloud, despite its ethereal name, is made of physical servers that can fail, flood, or simply get unplugged.

If your memory is distributed across systems you don't control, you've introduced vulnerability. Not theoretical vulnerability, but actual dependency on the continued functioning of infrastructure you can't see, operated by companies you have no relationship with beyond a terms of service agreement.

I've talked to people who've lost decades of photos to a failed hard drive. The grief is real. They've lost memories. Not metaphorically. Actually. Because the memories were stored externally, and the external storage failed.

This is the price of externalization: dependency. Every capability you offload is a capability you no longer have without the external system.

The Generation Gap

People who grew up before smartphones have a before-and-after perspective. They know what it was like to memorize phone numbers, to navigate without GPS, to not know something and have to wonder about it until they got to a library. That reference point lets them perceive the change.

People growing up now have no before. External memory is just how memory works. Looking something up isn't outsourcing; it's remembering. The boundary between internal and external has never been clear to them because it was never there.

I'm not sure which perspective is more accurate. The older view might be nostalgic, overvaluing a kind of cognitive autonomy that was always partial anyway. The younger view might be realistic, accepting the human-machine integration that has always been our destiny as tool-using creatures.

But the different perspectives do create different expectations, different anxieties, different relationships to the technology.

---

My grandmother's recipes were vulnerable to the frailty of her brain. When her brain failed, they were gone. There's something tragic about that, and something I want to resist.

My recipes are vulnerable to the frailty of the services that store them. If those services fail, they're gone. There's something unsettling about that too, and something I don't know how to resist.

Memory has always been fragile. We've just changed what kind of fragility we accept. The trade might be worth it. External memory is more capacious, more searchable, more shareable. But it's also more dependent, more alienated, less distinctly ours.

The question isn't whether to externalize. That ship has sailed. The question is how to maintain some relationship to our memories that feels like ownership, even when the memories live somewhere else. I don't have an answer, but I notice the tension more than most people seem to. And I wonder if the tension itself is a kind of memory that will soon be lost.